On Wed, 2014-06-11 at 17:57 +0200, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > Reindl Harald píše v St 11. 06. 2014 v 17:44 +0200: > > Am 11.06.2014 17:41, schrieb Jiri Eischmann: > > > +1, we've already skipped one release and we just can't delay > > > significantly more. Fedora is known as a fast-moving distribution. A > > > large portion of our user base is using Fedora just for that reason. Do > > > we really want to make even more of them switch to Arch? > > > > um F20 has Kernel 3.14, recent mesa, KDE 4.13 soon, recent LibreOffice > > and so on - what are you missing that justifies "move move, go on move!" > > Well... where do I start? For example the whole default desktop > platform? Yes, we have GNOME 3.12 Copr, but it brings practical > problems. > The whole graphics stack also cannot be completely rebased (it would > require new LLVM which would be too significant change within one > release) No, actually, we rebase LLVM and Mesa in existing Fedora already. xserver and the drivers are really the only bit that stay static, and (as mentioned else-thread) that could change if we had ze vill to do so. - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
