-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 (Sorry for double-reply; forgot to copy both lists) On 06/11/2014 10:56 AM, Kalev Lember wrote: > On 06/11/2014 04:37 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> I forgot to open a ticket over the last week, but the Server WG >> has identified that completion of its core task (the Server Role >> API) is likely to need a little extra time. This is a blocker to >> release, so we figured it would be best to ask FESCo to modify >> the schedule in advance, rather than forcing a slip at the end. >> >> I'll bring this up in Open Floor, unless you want to add it to >> the formal agenda. > > How much time do you think you'd need to complete the Server Role > API? We were planning to ask for two additional weeks on the schedule. We are not really expecting to get all of it. > > With my Workstation WG hat on, I'd very much like to avoid pushing > back the schedule. We already skipped one whole release; if we > slip F21 it's going to negatively impact how users perceive the > Workstation, and make it harder for Workstation developers to work > on the code upstream. > I agree, we don't want to slip much at all. I probably should have been clearer about the amount of slip we were going to ask for in the mail. > At the very least, please don't do a quick decision on today's IRC > meeting and allow some time to discuss this with other WGs. > > An alternative to slipping would also be to skip Server this > release cycle if it's not ready. Could try again in 6 months. > This would be a significant overreaction, I think. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ iEYEARECAAYFAlOYezsACgkQeiVVYja6o6Ni3QCcDL0zFaFOWg4oWkO8LW3zkoKz vt0AoJnHTi1aGVesP2XAg5F5kAs9pJ6c =7HDl -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
