Dne 30.5.2014 03:03, T.C. Hollingsworth napsal(a):
On Fri, May 16, 2014 at 3:39 AM, Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Is it true actually? Last time I was checking the Ruby packages contained
different/modified version of upstream JS files.
AFAICT they're both fine.
rubygem-uglifier includes the main uglify-js via git submodules:
https://github.com/lautis/uglifier/tree/master/vendor
That is not all. This is actually the Rakefile which prepares the
uglify.js file for uglifier:
https://github.com/lautis/uglifier/blob/master/Rakefile#L34
I.e. the uglifier.js is composed from source-map.js, uglifier.js and
some glue. I can't see any direct conversion path to webassets approach
without patching rubygem-uglifier. May be some loader shim could work.
Not sure. And I don't know how you want to generalize this to some
generic guidelines.
Sorry for being negative :)
Vít
And rubygem-coffee-script-source is just a browser build of
coffee-script. The main coffee-script package will be providing such
a build soon.
I'll file bugs with concrete patches when everything's ready.
-T.C.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
