Re: Another bug on OpenSSL

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 08.06.2014 16:42, schrieb Reindl Harald:
> Am 08.06.2014 16:21, schrieb Álvaro Castillo:
>> Few days was built an patch to solve an another vulnerability into
>> OpenSSL(http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2014/06/05/new-bug-found-in-widely-used-openssl-encryption/?_php=true&_type=blogs&_r=0).
>> Some sources talks about that's bug was discovered a long time ago but
>> does not fixed.
>>
>> However, OpenBSD was created a fork called LibreSSL try to solve this
>> issues. Should Fedora to move LibreSSL (http://www.libressl.org/)? Or
>> still use OpenSSL and wait what's bug could be found today, or
>> tomorrow, or few months to go similar Adobe Flash bugs?
> 
> you realized that LibreSSL *backported* the bugs you are
> talking about?

- backported the bug
+ backported the bugfixes

means there where found and fixed in OpenSSL and *after that* fixed in LibreSSL

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux