On Wed, 2014-06-04 at 16:51 +0200, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > 2014-06-03 22:46 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx>: > > > On Sun, 2014-04-20 at 18:56 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote, on behalf of Matthias Clasen: > > > > The Software Collections repositories will be enabled by default. > > > > > > So we now allow shipping the configuration for third-party repositories, > > > even enabled by default? Is April 1st still not over yet? > > > > > > If you want those packages in Fedora, they need to get into the Fedora > > > repository. > > > > THREAD NECRO ALERT > > > > I wouldn't put it as strongly as Kevin, but I do have some concerns > > about the implications here. > > > Note that there was a lot of discussion about this ( > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/1297 and meeting logs), resulting in > “merging” this Change proposal into the main SCL one in a way that makes > the original text of this proposal no longer relevant. (In particular, > AFAIK the full story is that SCLs will be available through Playground, and > Playground requires an explicit action to enable.) > > That does not *entirely* dismiss your concern, though. Thanks. I missed the follow-up in other locations. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
