Re: Current FTBFS packages (was Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 21)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday, June 3, 2014, 2:37:49 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Jun 2014 23:54:10 +0200
> Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2014 at 04:36:28PM -0400, Al Dunsmuir wrote:
>> 
>> > Please do not start deleting ppc32-only packages.
>> > 
>> > A  few  of  us  would  like  to resurrect ppc32, likely initially
>> > as a Fedora   Remix.   Deleting  ppc32-only  packages  just  adds
>> > more work to that effort.
>> 
>> ok, but I guess there is no package left that is not properly
>> configured in primary koji. If you continue with this effort, please
>> re-open the rel-eng ticket in my other e-mail regarding yaboot.

> In the past it wasn't possible to block secondary arch only package in
> primary koji after it was introduced there, because during some releng
> action (branching, mass rebuild?) it affected also the secondary koji.
> Or pkgdb, maybe both. The result was that secondary arch only package
> was not accessible for commits and blocked in secondary koji and we
> had to resolve it manually with dgilmore. So please be careful. I think
> the problem was that pkgdb had no information about arches, it worked
> globally.

Thanks for the heads-up!

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux