2014-05-29 22:28 GMT+02:00 Tim St Clair <tstclair@xxxxxxxxxx>:
I've been seeing this bug crop up in many circles:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1099282
At a first glance this seems like a bug in llvm-config, nothing obviously related to “default” cflags.
http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-config.html says llvm-config is supposed to return flags “needed to link against LLVM”, and AFAIK -fstack-protector-strong doesn’t affect ABI so doesn’t need to be returned by llvm-config in the first place.
http://llvm.org/docs/CommandGuide/llvm-config.html says llvm-config is supposed to return flags “needed to link against LLVM”, and AFAIK -fstack-protector-strong doesn’t affect ABI so doesn’t need to be returned by llvm-config in the first place.
Mirek
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
