On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, May 23, 2014 at 06:02:07PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> for Fedora 21 testing *overall* - i.e. it's the QA team's responsibility >> to make sure the WGs do the stuff assigned to them in the plan. If that >> makes sense. Discussion welcome! > > Yeah. If something isn't working, do you think the best path is QA->WG > directly, or should it be QA says something to FESCo, FESCo works with WG? If you want a collaborative effort, then the WGs and QA should be working directly together. Encouraging one party to tattle to FESCo on the other (either way) isn't setting things up for success. This will be hard at times. The two groups need to work through those issues mostly on their own or people are going to be disenfranchised that the WGs are actually in control of their products at all. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
