Am Samstag, den 24.05.2014, 10:47 -0400 schrieb Jeff Backus: > I am still interested in becoming a packager and am still in need of a > sponsor. I have submitted a new package for review that is both much > more simple and has a straightforward license :) > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100961 > > > Additionally, I have performed a few informal reviews in the hopes of > demonstrating my interest / possession of a glimmer of competence: > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055108 > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1058038 > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1094570 Hey Jeff! Welcome to the Fedora Package Maintainers! I just approved your filed review-request [1]. As you already have done some real good informal reviews as mentioned here, we could skip this and I've just sponsored you into the packager-group. The changes should be avail within the next hour. You can now procceed with the SCM-admin-request as explained here [2]. Please add me (besser82) on the InitialCC. As a new packager, tt is always a good thing to do some review on packages which are waiting for one [3]. Doing frequent package-reviews drastically increases the opportunities for having someone review your own package-review submissions. Another option is to negotiate `review-swaps` over this list, like offering some packages for review here and waiting for others to turn in their waiting packages in reply. Use your new powers for good! Cheers, Björn [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1100961 [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_SCM_admin_requests [3] http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
