On Wed, 7 May 2014 19:02:57 +0400
Igor Gnatenko <i.gnatenko.brain@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Not sure if this is bz worthy or just something to mention on a mail
> > list. I was doing some experimenting on creating SWID tags out of
> > the rpm database and noticed some inconsistencies. For example:
> >
> > # rpm -q --queryformat '%{DISTRIBUTION}\n' bash
> > Fedora Project
> > # rpm -q --queryformat '%{DISTRIBUTION}\n' xbmc
> > Fedora 20
> >
> > Seems that rpmfusion has it right and the main Fedora build system
> > is misconfigured.
>
> I think first right. How about EPEL?
If that's true, what tag should output Fedora 20? Something should. We
also have the VENDOR tag and that is Fedora Project. I think that is
the right place for Fedora Project.
-Steve
> > Also...
> >
> > # rpm -q --queryformat '%{PACKAGER}\n' bash
> > Fedora Project
> > # rpm -q --queryformat '%{PACKAGER}\n' xbmc
> > <http://free.rpmfusion.org/>
> >
> > Which is correct way to do it?
>
> First. We choosed first method for Copr (but with changes)
> >
> > # rpm -q --queryformat '%{DISTTAG}\n' bash
> > (none)
> > # rpm -q --queryformat '%{DISTTAG}\n' xbmc
> > (none)
> >
> > You would think this would spit out f20. But it doesn't.
>
> Here I think the same.
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
