----- Original Message ----- > From: "Farkas Levente" <lfarkas@xxxxxxxxxxx> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Sent: Tuesday, May 6, 2014 11:23:18 AM > Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8 > > is this version of eclipse be ported to rhel dev tools for rhel-6 and > rhel-7? As you probably have guessed I can not answer such questions. You can either speak to your TAM or wait for public announcements. Alexander Kurtakov Red Hat Eclipse team > > On 05/06/2014 09:50 AM, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote: > > One of the biggest offenders (Eclipse) is now happily compiling(always has > > been running fine) with Java 8 and while looking at fixing it many other > > issues has been identified and fixed so personally I'm fine with OpenJDK7 > > being obsoleted now. > > > > Alexander Kurtakov > > Red Hat Eclipse team > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Aleksandar Kurtakov" <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> To: "Deepak Bhole" <dbhole@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Development discussions related > >> to Fedora" <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:41:30 PM > >> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8 > >> > >> I'm not proposing having OpenJDK7 in Fedora 21. What I'm asking for is to > >> have them both for a month or two before obsoleting so transition can be > >> smoother if problems appear. > >> > >> Alexander Kurtakov > >> Red Hat Eclipse team > >> > >> ----- Original Message ----- > >>> From: "Deepak Bhole" <dbhole@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > >>> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>> Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2014 3:31:59 PM > >>> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8 > >>> > >>> * Christopher <ctubbsii@xxxxxxxxxx> [2014-03-25 19:59]: > >>>> I also would like to see 1.7.0 stick around for awhile. Not > >>>> necessarily as the default, but at least available in the repos. As it > >>>> stands, it's difficult to use a modern Fedora on projects that are > >>>> still developing against JDK 1.6. > >>>> > >>> > >>> Unfortunately, OpenJDK7 will be EOLd in April 2015[1], which is within > >>> the support time-frame of the F21. This is one the reasons why we would > >>> like to be able to switch over to OpenJDK8 asap for F21. > >>> > >>> 1: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/eol-135779.html > >>> > >>> Deepak > >>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Christopher L Tubbs II > >>>> http://gravatar.com/ctubbsii > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 4:05 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov > >>>> <akurtako@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>>>> Please keep java 1.7.0 around for some time. It would make moving > >>>>> easier > >>>>> if we have to jump back for a build or two. > >>>>> > >>>>> Alexander Kurtakov > >>>>> Red Hat Eclipse team > >>>>> > >>>>> ----- Original Message ----- > >>>>>> From: "Omair Majid" <omajid@xxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > >>>>>> <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >>>>>> Sent: Tuesday, March 25, 2014 9:07:39 PM > >>>>>> Subject: Re: F21 System Wide Change: Java 8 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> * Mikolaj Izdebski <mizdebsk@xxxxxxxxxx> [2014-03-24 11:55]: > >>>>>>> That's exactly the problem. We need to use a modified version of > >>>>>>> java-1.8.0-openjdk with extra provides and adjusted priorities for > >>>>>>> alternatives. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> I have started a new java-1.8.0-openjdk build that should fix this: > >>>>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=506921 > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Blocking java-1.7.0-oepnjdk may also be required. > >>>>>>> This > >>>>>>> makes it impossible to scratch-build Java packages using f21-build > >>>>>>> target in current state. > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Is there anything I can/should do here? Shall I file a rel-eng ticket > >>>>>> to > >>>>>> block java-1.7.0-openjdk? Would it be worth waiting a little while to > >>>>>> ensure that there are no show-stopper bugs in java-1.8.0-openjdk? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Thanks, > >>>>>> Omair > >>>>>> > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> PGP Key: 66484681 (http://pgp.mit.edu/) > >>>>>> Fingerprint = F072 555B 0A17 3957 4E95 0056 F286 F14F 6648 4681 > >>>>>> -- > >>>>>> devel mailing list > >>>>>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >>>>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > >>>>> -- > >>>>> devel mailing list > >>>>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >>>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > >>>> -- > >>>> devel mailing list > >>>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >>>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > >>> -- > >>> devel mailing list > >>> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >>> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > >> -- > >> devel mailing list > >> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > >> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct > > -- > Levente "Si vis pacem para bellum!" > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
