Hi,
That's my recollection as well. Heard that confusion about sbin being for superuser before.
Jon
On 5 May 2014 15:29, "Adam Jackson" <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 2014-05-04 at 18:59 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
> binaries which should not be overriden because a binary
> with the same name exists in /usr/bin
My memory is that the "s" was more for "static" not "superuser".
There's some conceptual overlap, static binaries being there to recover
even if your shared libraries are hosed which is normally a "superuser"
kind of operation, but.
- ajax
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
