Re: Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 04.05.2014 23:51, schrieb Björn Persson:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> Am 04.05.2014 18:54, schrieb Björn Persson:
>>> Reindl Harald wrote:
>>>> no, in general /usr/sbin is supposed to come before /usr/bin
>>>> and any software assuming the opposite has a bug
>>>>
>>>> Am 04.05.2014 18:11, schrieb Ankur Sinha:
>>>>> /usr/bin is supposed to come before /usr/sbin etc.
>>>
>>> I don't know of any kind of standard that specifies either. Does
>>> Posix specify this for example? Does anyone have a link?
>>
>> normally no software should break independent of that
>> order because it finds the binary anyways in the path
>> and it is unlikely in a clean setup that the same
>> binary exists in both
> 
> Right, and in the absence of a specified order in PATH it's a bug if
> anything depends on *any* particular order.
> 
>> however, the semantics of /usr/sbin is to contain superuser
>> binaries which should not be overriden because a binary
>> with the same name exists in /usr/bin
> 
> The Filesystem Hierarchy Standard says only that the sbin directories
> are for programs that only system administrators use, and justifies them
> with "a good partition between binaries that everyone uses and ones that
> are primarily used for administration tasks". The part about not
> overriding binaries is your own, personal opinion.

no, given that /usr/sbin/iptables is clearly a administrative
command and so there is no valid reason to seek for iptables
in /usr/bin/ nor have it as override is a logical conclusion

if you want to override things /usr/local/bin and /usr/local/sbin
are your friends - however - back to topic:

"Incorrect order of /usr/bin and /usr/sbin in path" is plain wrong
and the PATH /usr/sbin:/usr/bin is in any case correct - period

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux