On Wed, 30.04.14 10:42, Daniel J Walsh (dwalsh@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote: > > On 04/30/2014 10:28 AM, Adam Jackson wrote: > > On Wed, 2014-04-30 at 16:05 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > > >> I suspect just dropping the deps would break initial installations, e.g. > >> anaconda / livecd-creator. RPM uses the deps to order the transaction so > >> that systemd gets installed first, and the packages that ship service > >> files get installed later. Without the deps, rpm wouldn't know the order > >> in which it has to run the transaction. > >> > >> For example, when a package bar has a postinstall script that does: > >> > >> systemctl enable bar.service >/dev/null 2>&1 || : > >> > >> ... but if systemctl gets installed _after_ foo in the same transaction, > >> then the systemctl command never runs and service stays disabled. > > If you are right, this is an argument for rpm collections, which we've > > had for ages now and should really start using. > > > > - ajax > > > Created a ticket. > > https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/425 > > Next I will create a change request if the ticket is approved. Note that just dropping systemd from your images might not be the best choice, as you then have no owners for a lot of drop-in dirs, which made be bad for verifying the software installed in the container images... Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
