On Fri, 2004-11-19 at 17:51 -0500, Jeff Johnson wrote: > The problem is well known, has poppped up repeatedly, is way too complicated > to analyze back to the root cause (which was that only /bin/sh has > "rpm_script_t" as > exec context type), is "fixed" in rpm-4.3.3 (for FC4), and will be fixed > elsewhere > as soon as I find a "rpm_execcon" symbol in a libselinux that I can link > against, I've seen this on targeted machines too, where rpm and scriptlets run as unconfined_t, correct? The above bug report is against selinux-policy- targeted too.
