2014-04-29 17:40 GMT+02:00 Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx>:
On Tue, 29.04.14 16:58, Alexander Larsson (alexl@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:I am pretty sure that the weak-modules thing should just go. It's
> Its around 15 megs or so, although on rhel7 its 20 megs larger because
> of a dependency that kmod has on /usr/bin/nm (binutils) that doesn't
> seem to be there on fedora kmod. This seems like a bug in fedora though,
> as kmod ships /usr/sbin/weak-modules which calls nm, so once fixed
> fedora would be at 35 meg too.
outdated cruft, for some enterprise thing, and inused in Fedora.
That "outdated cruft" is AFAICS still part of the RHEL-7 ABI design. Assuming the same people will end up maintaining it whether it is in Fedora or RHEL-7, I can't see that work going away, though whether to maintain it "upstream" in Fedora or as a RHEL-only patch is basically up to the individual maintainers.
Mirek
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
