Em 28-04-2014 11:14, Paul Wouters escreveu:
On Mon, 28 Apr 2014, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
Speaking of which, I am not sure how dnsmasq plays with DNSSEC and/or
failover, but NetworkManager already has a config option
(/etc/NetworkManager/NetworkManager.conf, dns=dnsmasq) that makes it
configure a local dnsmasq instance on 127.0.0.1 for handling DNS
requests. The dnsmasq then is the one who will go after the real
servers & all..
Isn't making this the default way enough perhaps?
No, that is missing all the features for hotspot signon and VPN
integration.
Missing VPN integration, which part of it? Because I'm using it quite
well on F20 with the VPN I have to use. I didn't bother looking into
details as it just worked fine for me.
But still, ok, that was perphaps too stretched. We may have some bits to
adjust, but the idea behind dns=dnsmasq sounds like the one proposed
here, no?
Marcelo
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
