On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 08:57:27AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sun, 2014-04-27 at 23:02 +0100, Andrew Price wrote: > > On 24/04/14 15:13, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > We probably should make setjmp()-freeness a requirement for > > > all code included in Fedora. > > > > Would it be worth the effort, and how feasible is it anyway? > > I don't think it'd be worth the effort, and I think the burden of > computing feasibility should rest with those who think it _is_ worth the > effort. > Well, we could consider banning it from new packages and just let attrition take care of the rest. --CJD
Attachment:
pgpDXsjn0k4Ew.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
