On Thu, 24 Apr 2014 11:29:15 +0200 Miroslav Suchý <msuchy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1090516 > Jiri asked for removing Copr (and Playground) DNF plugin out of > dnf-plugins-core. > > Since this is not technical but merely political question I would > like to ask wider audience: Put your voice here please: > http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=5358d77de4b06a67c5b08e05 > If there will be significant votes for one option, I would do what > most of you wish. Otherwise I will forward it to Fesco for decision. I'm not sure a open vote is the way to go here. How about we try and figure this out on technical grounds? Personally I think it's fine to be in dnf-plugins-core, but the maintainers of dnf don't think so I guess, but that could just be that the audience isn't clear for the playground repo yet. It seems like something the env-and-stacks group could look into? ie, decide what the audience is for the playground repo. Is this intended only for advanced users/developers? Then, I suppose it could be a seperate package that they would have to know to install. If it's intended for general users if they know to look/enable it, then it needs to be at least installed by default. kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
