Marcela Mašláňová (mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > On 04/14/2014 10:17 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > >Jaroslav Reznik (jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > >>= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby193 in SCL = > >>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby193_in_SCL > >> > >>Change owner(s): Marcela Mašláňová <mmaslano@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >>Ruby 1.9.3 with Rails 3.2.8 is still commonly used by many projects. Let's > >>provide Ruby and Rails in SCL even for Fedora. Rails depends on exact v8 > >>version, which means v8 3.14 must have also their own SCL as part of the SCL. > > > >Is the intent to only provide SCL versions of the older ruby & rails, or > >also the current versions (i.e., move to SCL as the rails delivery mechanism > >going forward)? > > I'm doing one collection. If there is someone who want to donate his free > time to do also new version, I'm fine with it, but I don't see any use-case > right now. What I was thinking of was simply having a uniform way to access a rails stack (or whatever) - not having to have the developer/admin keep track of whether the version they want is packaged as an SCL or not, and having to adjust their environment/setup accordingly. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct