Re: Python 3 and mod_wsgi

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 04/15/2014 01:08 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 04:54:33PM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
AFAIK you can't have 2 mod_wsgi's, each one compiled against a
different Python major.minor, loaded by Apache at the same time for
various reasons. So the best solution would IMO be to create
python3-mod_wsgi (subpackage of mod_wsgi), that would conflict with
mod_wsgi. It should be perfectly doable and it shouldn't break
anything. CCing Matthias, the owner of mod_wsgi in Fedora - Matthias,
what do you think?

This is done in f21 already thanks to Jakub Dorňák (#1035876) - I guess
we could backport to f20 without any problems.


Sorry for jumping in so late here, I'm currently on PTO and nearly excluded from the net.

To the question: yes, there is already a patch for f21 and it makes sense to backport it. There's also a bz ticket requesting exactly that[1]. I also saw Toshios additions and his bz ticket[2] to track the conflicts issue.

I simply didn't found the time to do so, but will look onto that, when I'm back. If anyone wants to do this earlier, please go ahead!

Best,
Matthias


[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1082109
[2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1087943
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux