On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 02:14:25PM +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 04/15/2014 01:26 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > NOTE: If you are in the CC of this email, then you don't need to do
> > anything. I will fix your package for you. However you
> > should still read the email.
> >
> >Some OCaml spec files do the following:
> >
> > ExclusiveArch: %{ocaml_arches}
> >
> >This is always incorrect for several reasons:
> >
> >(1) This macro is provided by redhat-rpm-config, and has the wrong
> >list of architectures.
> >
> >(2) OCaml compiles on all architectures.
> >
> >There may be some packages using this macro to mean "I need the OCaml
> >native code compiler", which is still wrong, but I'm going to fix this
> >by adding the following macros to the RPM config:
> >
> > %ocaml_native_compiler # all arches that support native compilation
> >
> > %ocaml_natdynlink # all arches that support native dynamic linking
> >
>
> Not that it matters to me, but these names seem a bit inconsistent.
> Why not %ocaml_native_dynlink to go with %ocaml_native_compiler? Its
> not any longer :)
The feature upstream is called "natdynlink", so I guess it's better to
keep the shorter name.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
