Am 12.04.2014 17:21, schrieb Paul Wouters: > On Sat, 12 Apr 2014, Reindl Harald wrote: > >>> That's wrong. a DNS server can use a forwareder for some or all of its >>> recursive queries. unbound+dnssec-triggerd mostly cause unbound to do >>> full recursion but using the ISP nameserver as forward for all queries. >> >> oh no - please try to understand what recursion means in case of DNS >> >> may i suggest to read some docs because if i talk about DNS as one >> who maintains 600 domains as DNS provider as well as Registry for >> the .at domain and implemented DNS admin-backends years ago i know >> what i am talking about > > If we are going to do appeals to authority for making arguments, I've > been doing DNSSEC since 2001, ran an ISP between 1995 and 2005 that had > 500+ domains, have pending DNS RFC drafts out there, am acknowledged > on many more DNS RFCs published, am a member of a global DNS incident > response team, member of DNS-OARC, implemented a failover dual-software > dual-setup multi-local DNSSEC signed for a TLD larger that .at praised > by the entire DNS industry, performed DNS outage post-mortem at one of > Canada's largest banks and was one of ten ICANN newGTLD Registry Services > panel members evaluting the 1500 new TLD submissions for their technical > implementations of DNS and Registry Services. I think I know what > recursion means..... > > Now can we go back to actually discussion technical arguments again? than stop repsond with "That's wrong" if i tell someone forwarding != recursion because you should know it better and use correct terms
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
