On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 11:39:19PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> To clarify this: while I believe dropping securetty from the default PAM
> config is the right thing to do, I am not vulunteering to do it. But I'd
> love to see somebody to pick this up!
I looked, and I think this is just a change in util-linux package (not the
source even; the pam files are packaged as separate sources) + a note in the
release notes. It's not referenced in authconfig or anything.
I guess maybe we'd also want to remove /etc/securetty to reduce confusion
(since the normal semantics are that missing file = nothing blocked), that's
in setup.
But otherwise, I think it just comes down to filing an RFE and getting the
util-linux maintainer on board. Probably best after this change proposal
gets to FESCo — at that point, I'll put this forward as a counter-proposal.
--
Matthew Miller -- Fedora Project -- <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
"Tepid change for the somewhat better!"
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
