On Sat, 05 Apr 2014 09:08:57 -0600 Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Like wise. The one change that might be nice would be to try would be > to consolidate the broken deps a bit - just a single note that a > package has broken dep in all arches (and listing those deps) rather > than repeating three times. It also will not scale if we add more > primary architectures. Where is the source for this mail? I'm glad you asked. ;) The base calls are all in the buildrawhide script: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/releng/tree/scripts/buildrawhide#n195 basically it's the start time, the depcheck from /usr/share/mash/spam-o-matic (in the mash package) repodiff output from the previous day and finish time. So, the depcheck part is in mash: https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/mash/tree/utils/spam-o-matic Ideas for better output welcome! kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
