Re: Considering GNOME 3.12 as an F20 update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 04/04/2014 05:40 PM, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
>> First after the upgrade I didn't even boot to GDM. Too bad I didn't
>> debug it because I had already been considering a clean install, so I
>> did it right away. My setup was not typical, I had been upgrading since
>> F15. But apparently I was not the only one. One guy on the forum
>> complained about a very similar problem. He blames i686 packages and
>> their dependencies which might have been my problem as well because due
>> to Steam I also had a lot from the graphics stack installed in i686
>> versions.
>
> I had the same problem. It turned out I was missing the glib2 package
> update from the COPR. The reason was that I had both glib2.x86_64 and
> glib2.i686 installed, but I only enabled the x86_64 COPR. dnf silently
> skipped updating the package due to this problem.

COPRs lack of multilib support is really broken .. is there work being
done to fix this?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux