On 04/02/2014 08:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > A quick check shows lbzip2 doesn't provide a library interface, much less > one compatible with libbz2. Is that ever intended? > > If it's not, saying lbzip2 is the default bzip2 *implementation* may be a > bit of a stretch. Perhaps s/implementation/command/. I have clarified that in the change proposal by explicitly stating that this change replaces bzip2 tool only and that libbzip2 is not affected. http://fedoraproject.org/w/index.php?title=Changes/lbzip2&diff=375469&oldid=375468 -- Mikolaj Izdebski Software Engineer, Red Hat IRC: mizdebsk -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
