On Thu, 2014-04-03 at 19:31 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote: > will that below ever get fixed in F20? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1072368 The developer does not consider it to be a bug. You may disagree, but so far, you don't seem to have convinced him or any other systemd developers or, well, anyone else. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010572 This is an entirely trivial issue: a failed attempt to access something with no apparent negative consequences. Doesn't seem like it'd be a high priority. It also doesn't seem like it would be too difficult to track down and propose a fix, if it's bugging you so much. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626477 You yourself have reported in https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=626477#c44 that this is fixed on the systemd 208 branch, which F20 is tracking. Then you went nuts and started yelling at people, which as you've been told fifty six thousand goddamn times by now, never ever helps. From the latest comments it sounds like whenever f20 is updated to the latest systemd-208 code, this fix will come in. It's up to the package maintainer when they want to do that. > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1047148 Apparently fixed in 20 and Rawhide, you just want a backport to 19? > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1024379 Is another extremely trivial one: you're throwing your toys out of the pram over slightly sub-optimal autocomplete? Really? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
