Am 03.04.2014 19:54, schrieb drago01: > On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 7:52 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Am 03.04.2014 19:47, schrieb drago01: >>> Note: I didn't look at the bugs >> >> then please don't answer at all > > What I wrote does not depend on what the bugs actually are it does and honestly bugs which are reported before release and open 7 months later in a core-component ar enot doing the distribution a favour as well as upstream developers of such a component even discuss against kernel upstream that they are doing the right thing until Linus has that muche enough to impend prohibit one of the core developers to commit code in the future this ignorance against downstream and users and break things careless which where not broken, make maintaining machines more and more complicated by spew nonsense in the logs and demand users to change their way of work to make upstream happy is a real bad attitude and in case of "but reportes are not friendly enough" - well, cause and effect >> It does become a problem when you have a system service >> developer who thinks the universe revolves around him, >> and nobody else matters, and people sending him bug-reports >> are annoyances that should be ignored rather than acknowledged >> and fixed. At that point, it's a problem.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
