Hello Al, On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, 5:14:53 PM, Al Dunsmuir wrote: > On Wednesday, April 2, 2014, 4:27:55 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >>> ** possibly adjust spec files to require or build-require lbzip2 instead of >>> bzip2. >> Is this necessary? Wouldn't it be better to have lbzip2 Provide bzip2 >> or something so that updating all those packages is not necessary, >> and also that people who prefer normal bzip2 can still use it? It's been a long day. In my haste to reply, I wrote "libzip" where I meant to say "lbzip2". The rest of my point remains unchanged. By the way, part of the reason for my slip is that while I have heard of a "libzip" library, I have never heard of lbzip2 before. I've never seen it come up with web searches related to the InfoZIP work to support bzip2 encoding. I'm going to post the original post and my comments in the private InfoZIP development list, but I suspect I will get responses that I am not the only person becoming aware of this new tool. Al -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
