On Wed, Apr 02, 2014 at 03:10:23PM -0400, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > > On 04/02/2014 11:33 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > packages using the library (output of yum remove > > > bzip2-libs-1.0.6-9.fc20.x86_64) > > > > Try: repoquery --whatrequires 'libbz2.so.1()(64bit)' > > > > We'll certainly need to keep the library around. > > Yes, but we can have /usr/bin/bzip2 (and other commands) pointing to > lbzip2 binary and at the same time applications can keep using libbz2. Hm, both python-libs and python3-libs, and rpm are on the list. This means that basically every system will have two implementations of bzip2. Not *that* big of an issue, but it certainly would be nicer to add the library interface so that we can get rid of this duplication. Zbyszek -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
