Re: [CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2014-04-02 at 09:12 -0700, quickbooks office wrote:
> [CHANGE PROPOSAL] The securetty file is empty by default
> 
> All the info has been sitting here @
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/securetty_file_is_empty_by_default
> since March 20th.
> 
> Did I mess something up? Or is there just a backlog?
> -- 
> devel mailing list
> devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

How does someone express strong disagreement to this change ?

I often install machines with root only as my users are all in my
FreeIPA/LDAP server and I expect to be able to login as root on the
console for maintenance purposes.

This change makes it very hard to do necessary maintenance. I can
understand blocking SSH login as root with password by default, but I do
not understand what is the point of blocking console login as root.

Please explain the logic of blocking console logins but allowing SSH
logins, it is completely backwards.

Simo.

-- 
Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux