On Thu, 2014-03-27 at 13:40 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > Fedora *is* a platform, not just a set of packages, however half-assedly > we conform to that vision, so I guess I just feel a bit uncomfortable > not at least putting up a few hoops for this to jump through. :) OpenGTL here is something of an implementation detail. RHEL's Mesa at this point links against a private build of llvm that is explicitly _not_ part of The Platform, for exactly this reason: it's not something we can commit to supporting for any use beyond Mesa itself, even in the extreme short term. It might be nice if Fedora adopted the common practice (among other OSes with interface assurances) of at least attempting to define stability levels. Whose action item would that be? - ajax -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
