On Wed, Mar 26, 2014 at 1:59 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Am 26.03.2014 18:52, schrieb Stephen Gallagher: >> On 03/26/2014 11:30 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >>> i just tried on F20 and "PrivateDevices" is not known sadly because >>> i have some services in mind where i would like that >> >>> Mär 26 15:51:55 testserver.rhsoft.net systemd[1]: >>> [/usr/lib/systemd/system/httpd.service:15] Unknown lvalue >>> 'PrivateDevices' in section 'Service' >> >> PrivateNetwork seems to have been around since at least 2012. The >> commit providing PrivateDevices[1] went upstream on January 20th. > > correct and in use here for longer time > >> According to >> git describe 7f112f50fea585411ea2d493b3582bea77eb4d6e >> >> we get v208-1612-g7f112f5 which means it went in 1,612 patches after >> v208 was released, so it's definitely not in F20 or RHEL 7 beta > > which is just bad, after the announcement i planned to configure > postfix, dbmail, dovecot, httpd... on my local testmachine using > PrivateDevices=yes since /dev/urnadom and friends are statet as > available and test out if it is do-able in production > > that said the announcement with words like "recent systemd" as > well as the documentation is just poor because it does nowhere > state the required systemd version which reflects the not care > about downstream or users attitude The Change is targeted at rawhide/F21. It is not unreasonable to expect that one translate "recent" to "the systemd in rawhide" (which is systemd-v212) in this context. So I think "poor" is a bit much, but I do agree listing the minimum systemd version would be good to add. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
