----- Original Message ----- > On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 1:07 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 04:41:29PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote: > >> > >> An alternative would be to reassign every open merge review to the > >> component > >> in question, and let maintainers handle it as they like. > >> > >> Thoughts? > >> > > Alternative idea -- maybe identify all packages which are not ciritcal and > > have an open merge review. Take those packages out of the repository. > > That's a bit harsh ... we have been shipping those packages for years, why > suddenly drop them? What problem does this solve? Yep, it's really too strict. Also setting the bar how much package is critical sounds weird. For reviews - I'd say most of the review requests bugs are already obsolete. What would actually help making Fedora better would be regular fedora- review (*) runs - even I'm again a bit sceptical we would be able to go through it same as for merge reviews. But for more active maintainers it could help them to make SPECs better. (*) not full review, much more easier tool to check basic sanity of SPECs... Jaroslav > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
