Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > So here's the thing daemons and applications are inconsistent in their > support for libwrap like for example sshd supports it while smbd does > not which leads to incorrect configuration and administrative > expectation which in itself poses a security risk. I don't buy that argument. In particular, don't let perfect be the enemy of good, ie, if libwrap isn't perfect => get rid of it, isn't a logical conclusion here (for *this* particular reason at least). -- Rex -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
