Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 21.03.2014 23:31, schrieb Jóhann B. Guðmundsson:
> 
> On 03/21/2014 10:30 PM, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 6:16 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" <johannbg@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:johannbg@xxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
>>
>>     In other words you are telling us that now to get something implemented or removed in Fedora we have to not
>>     only deal with our usual politics and bureaucracy but also all the downstream distribution to us as well...
>>
>>
>> One way to avoid those pesky details is to not have users... :-)
> 
> One way to prevent advancement and innovation within Fedora is precisely what's taking place here.
> 
> Three layers to get things done... 

you call it "innovation"

others call it bad names to break every day compatibility and force
anybody to follow changes nobobody asked for because only if changes
have a great impact to anybody they are recognized

the whole environment moves in circles with less to zero gain
the last past years but hey you are cool if you change things

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux