Re: Maybe it's time to get rid of tcpwrappers/tcpd?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21.03.14 00:27, Paul Wouters (paul@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> On Fri, 21 Mar 2014, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> 
> >I mean, in this day and age we should not consider an ACL language well
> >designed if it basically pushes users to use IDENT and DNS for
> >authentication. (And no, don't say the words DNSSEC, nobody sets that
> >up, we don't have it as default, and tcpwrap doesn't check wether DNSSEC
> >is enabled either, before trusting a hostname...).
> 
> we kinda do have dnssec per default. All DNS servers installed per
> default do DNSSEC. Installing dnssec-trigger makes that even more
> pervasive.

Well, but glibc can't do the DNSSEC client side, can it?

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering, Red Hat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux