On 03/19/2014 02:56 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 02:32:40PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> Hmm, I like this alternative a lot. I'm probably taking this too >> far, but I'm thinking of: >> >> fail2ban-server - core components with minimal deps >> >> fail2ban-firewalld - firewalld support/configuration - requires firewalld >> fail2ban-hostsdeny - tcp_wrappers hosts.deny support - requires tcp_wrappers >> fail2ban-mail - mail actions - requires /usr/bin/mail >> fail2ban-sendmail - sendmail actions - requires /usr/sbin/sendmail >> fail2ban-shorewall - shorewall support - requires shorewall >> fail2ban-systemd - systemd journal configuration >> >> fail2ban - default component - installs -firewalld,-sendmail,-systemd >> fail2ban-all - installs everything - also requires /usr/bin/whois >> >> Comments? > > That _might_ be going overboard. But it certainly does allow a lot of > flexibility. Somewhere there is a balance between that flexibility and the > extra packaging work and potential user confusion, and I'm not exactly sure > where that line is in this case. :) This seemed reasonable to me so I've gone with it in rawhide now. Testing welcome. > (Call the last one -journald or -systemd-journald by the way -- otherwise, > people will expect the unit files to be there.) I kept going back and forth and that, but the configuration option is named "systemd" in fail2ban, so I went with that. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
