On Tue 18 Mar 2014 07:03:31 PM CET Miloslav Trmač wrote: > 2014-03-18 15:31 GMT+01:00 Jaroslav Reznik <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx>: >> = Proposed System Wide Change: Optional Javadocs = >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/OptionalJavadocs > > I suppose shipping API documentation for end-user applications really > doesn't make sense. Any reasonably-widely-used library should contain > off-line documentation, if at all possible, IMHO. Well as-of-this-moment-current guidelines actually mandate API documentation even for end-user apps so there's room for improvement :-) >> Release Notes >> Javadoc subpackages have been made optional. > "Made optional" is true from the packaging guidelines' point of view; for > the users, some subpackages have simply been *removed*, and there's nothing > optional about that. You have a point, I'll rephrase that -- Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Developer Experience PGP: 7B087241 Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
Attachment:
pgp_h3BE7Ijfz.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
