Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Security Policy In The Installer

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 02:57:33PM -0400, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday, March 14, 2014 06:53:42 PM Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > Having separate server, workstation and cloud products means we can
> > apply separate defaults without requiring user interaction. Beyond that,
> > why would an end user want to choose common criteria during an
> > interactive install? Isn't that something that should be imposed on them
> > by their local admin?
> 
> Yes, and I believe the kick start would do that. I would also even see a case 
> where an admin takes the base policy and tailors it with site specific settings 
> and puts that into effect instead of the default one we provide. I like the 
> idea of choice.

Exactly, this is functionality that makes sense for enterprise and 
automated deployments. I don't see it making sense for an interactive 
install.

-- 
Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux