On Fri, 2014-03-14 at 11:22 -0400, Jan Lieskovsky wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 06:25:03AM -0400, Jan Lieskovsky wrote: > > > > > One hypothetical [*] scenario coming to my mind being the users might be > > > willing to provide customized policy content to Fedora installation. Let's > > > suppose the case there is a SCAP content for vulnerability checking (and > > > ensuring > > > some restrictions) for Fedora systems. Something like is done for Red Hat > > > Enterprise Linux case: > > > https://www.redhat.com/security/data/metrics/ > > > > This seems pretty niche. > > I am not sure how niche case this is or not. Was just an example when this > might be desired. > > > The cost associated with it is UI that makes no > > sense to most users but is presented to them by default anyway. I think > > we should concentrate on finding a way to make this possible without > > compromising the common case. > > Would making that spoke / field expandable upon click be sufficient? > (though this might result into situation the feature would went completely > unnoticed by some users, on the other hand wouldn't mean such big divergence > from actual state) I agree with Matt and Bill that this doesn't sound like something appropriate to display in the installer in the usual case, and I don't think that idea makes it any better (if anything it just pointlessly complicates the installer UI). -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
