On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 3:56 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > 2) If we allow switching between products, we probably have to treat > the entire Product configuration of a package as a single unit. ok. > Edits to somefile.conf would change whatever's on the other end of the > link. The alternatives system would change this linkage, to another > version, but switching it back will give you your edits, not just the > original defaults. If this is what we do, then the target of that link must be marked in the rpm packages as %conf, regardless of where it resides. For an approach like this, which I'm not yet sure I like, I'd consider putting some effort on improving alternatives. It's never been used for editable targets afaict. cheers, m -- martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx - ask interesting questions - don't get distracted with shiny stuff - working code first ~ http://docs.moodle.org/en/User:Martin_Langhoff -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
