Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Mar 9, 2014 7:49 AM, "Kevin Kofler" <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Directory and file interaction is a hard problem. There's no right thing
> > to do in this case.  The many possible things we could do all have one
> > drawback or another in certain cases.
>
> The right thing is clear: If all the files inside the directory are owned by
> packages about to be removed in the transaction, just rm -rf the directory
> (or rather the equivalent in C code),

Yes, the simple case is simple.

> otherwise rename it with a suffix
> (.rpmsave, if necessary .rpmsave0, .rpmsave1, … , .rpmsave10, …) and only
> delete the files owned by packages about to be removed in the transaction.
>
But this is where the answers start to have drawbacks.  As just one example, renaming the directory will break other packages which installed files into that directory.

-Toshio

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux