Re: pdftk retired?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> The only things I read in the thread are "GCJ is abandoned" and "we
> really want to get rid of GCJ". Am I supposed to come to the
> conclusion that the GCJ package is dropped from Fedora? If so, where
> is this decision made? Why was it made without consulting GCJ users?
> 
> We have so many abandoned projects packaged in Fedora. I don't
> understand the rush to drop one of them.

+1. Both GCJ itself and pdftk are extremely useful packages that shouldn't 
get retired without giving other maintainers the chance to pick them up!

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux