2014-03-05 9:58 GMT+01:00 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos <nmav@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> The above proposed levels broadly make sense (taking 80/128/256 as a> "nice round numbers" that stand for detailed strenghts), we wouldWould that be required to be part of the fedora change? I'd prefer if
> probably want to explicitly document the semantics (Is the semantics
> of a level fixed forever or will it be updated? Will we remove a weak
> cipher from an existing level (ever / during a single Fedora release)?
> Will we add a cipher to alevel (ever / during a single Fedora
> release?).
the semantics are not fixed before the actual levels are fixed.
I don't think it's required for FESCo to make a decision (but I can't speak for other FESCo members); it should be defined by F21 release so that the users know what they have been promised.
Mirek
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
