On Tue, Mar 04, 2014 at 03:23:28PM +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: > > * additional repository - Playground requirements (mmaslano, 13:03:05) > * how do updates work (rolling? bodhi? Will we constantly be > regenerating the repodata [like the rawhide build repo?]) > (mmaslano, 13:07:16) > * rolling + constantly regenerating repodata (mmaslano, 13:10:26) > * one repo per Fedora release + arch (tjanez, 13:11:14) > * daily push (mmaslano, 13:12:25) > * no bodhi yet (mmaslano, 13:14:02) > * Do we trust this person to keep the repo up to date and address > serious bugs/security issues. (mmaslano, 13:20:50) > * we could always have the fedora-playground-release package > "Obsoletes: badapp-$version" (mmaslano, 13:29:09) > * is there a testing repo? (mmaslano, 13:42:12) > * testing repo - not needed, testing are coprs (mmaslano, 13:43:07) > * The repo will attempt to do automatic package review, falling back > to human intervention on known trouble cases such as Obsoletes. > (tjanez, 14:02:13) > * ACTION: tjanez will add comments from our today's meeting to Open > Questions (mmaslano, 14:09:55) > Did anyone forward the playground repo proposal on to FESCo? FESCo needs to know about things we are hooping to do in time for tomorrow's meeting (officially, Monday, Mar 3... but discussion will start at the meeting tomorrow). -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpGrGh_Me5cA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
