Re: Major release number bump is lower than beta for html5lib module.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 11:05 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
> > yes it is a hack but better than fake version numbers to
> > satisfy RPM and that is *the* reason epoch exists at all
> 
> +1
> 
> That Ubuntu-style apples-101.reallyoranges versioning is misleading and 
> against Fedora packaging guidelines.

Yeah, I'd agree with Harald and Kevin in this case: 1.0-0.2.999 is a
horrible version string, I wouldn't have recommended it even if it had
been possible. This kind of situation really is the one in which it *is*
correct to use Epoch - when upstream versioning goes backwards, and
upstream cannot change it.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux