Re: fedpkg build failing (due to NSS?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Am 03.03.2014 09:14, schrieb Mathieu Bridon:
> On Mon, 2014-03-03 at 16:06 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
>> I've left a negative karma there, they forgot to add the new nss-util
>> into overrides list.
> 
> No, it's been added, but then it was expired:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/edit?build=nss-util-3.15.5-1.fc20
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/override/edit?build=nss-softokn-3.15.5-1.fc20
> 
> That's not the problem at all.
> 
> The problem is that **some** of these 3 overrides were epired, but not
> all.
> 
> The three packages need to always be in overrides together, or none of
> them.
> 
> Leaving a negative karma to the update won't help fix the problem
> either

i simply do not get why they are not built from the same srpm

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SplitSoftoknFromNSS
is invalid - if there are no hard dependencies between the
subpackages then this is no valid reason no just build
all of them at once because finally it happens anyways
that they are available in the same version

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066877#c4

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux