tir, 16.11.2004 kl. 22.47 skrev Per Bjornsson: > On Tue, 2004-11-16 at 15:54 -0500, Josh Bressers wrote: > > On Tue, 16 Nov 2004 21:43:01 +0100, Kyrre Ness Sjobak > > <kyrre@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Could somebody please do something about this: > > > > > > - Fedora Core 3: > > > Coming soon > > > > > > http://www.fedora.us/wiki/FedoraSources#yum > > > > It's a Wiki. Anyone can change it, feel free. > > Perhaps the real problem is that the directory that it should be > pointing to - the Fedora.us "extras" RPM directory for FC3 - is still > empty? ;) (With the mirror list stuff in Yum and up2date it seems pretty > pointless to ask people to point Yum to the download.fedora.us site I > think, so the only relevant link there would be the one for extra > packages.) Look at http://download.fedora.us , the directory is there > but there is nothing in it.) > > Actually, what are the plans regarding a rebuild of Extras for FC3? In > general I think the FC2 builds do work, but there are annoyances; e.g. > C++ packages typically need the compat-libstdc++ package since they are > built against an older version of the C++ standard library. (Notably > this is true for Inkscape, I discovered this when Inkscape just didn't > start after my FC3 upgrade.) Sure I can just rebuild most SRPMs but > isn't the point of having repositories that people can just point to > them and install stuff? Is this stalling on getting the Red Hat build > infrastructure for Extras in place? > > Cheers, > Per > Oops. I have been looking in the rpms.os dir... But the extras is empty. Damnit.
